Remedies · Lesson 13
Declaratory Judgment
這一課問的是：法院應否在不發強制救濟下，為當事人確認法律權利？
ActorActObjectStandardConsequence
Core Terminology · 7 must-know
Tap a card to flip and reveal the meaning.
declaratory judgment
Tap to see meaning
Judicial declaration of rights without coercive relief.
宣告判決。
Declaratory Judgment Act
Tap to see meaning
28 USC §2201.
宣告判決法。
actual controversy
Tap to see meaning
Required for justiciability.
實際爭議。
discretionary
Tap to see meaning
Court has discretion to grant.
裁量權。
preventive use
Tap to see meaning
Anticipate disputes before they ripen into damage.
預防使用。
Rule Sentence · the workhorse
Under the Declaratory Judgment Act (28 USC §2201), a federal court has discretion to issue a declaratory judgment in cases of actual controversy within its jurisdiction; the remedy declares the parties' rights without ordering coercive relief.
Mini IRAC · build the Application
Issue. Should the federal court grant declaratory judgment determining whether an insurance policy covers a specific liability before the insured is sued?
Rule. A federal court has discretion to grant declaratory judgment in cases of actual controversy, allowing parties to clarify legal rights before damage occurs.
Application (model). The insured faces an ongoing dispute over coverage; the insurer denies coverage and the insured needs to know whether to defend at its own expense. Because the Declaratory Judgment Act permits declaration in cases of actual controversy, the fact that the coverage dispute is concrete and ripe — though not yet resulting in a final liability — means the court has discretion to declare.
Pick the right element for each blank:
g1.
g2.
Conclusion. Therefore, the court may grant declaratory judgment determining coverage.
Practice Drill · tap to build the rule
Drop the chips here in correct order:
Tap chips to add → tap chips in the target to remove: