GuoBar Legal Education

Wrongful Termination

Open Lesson·Legal English Grammar · 5 roles
Employment Law · Lesson 09

Wrongful Termination

這一課問的是:解僱是否違反法律、合約、公共政策、或其他保護?

ActorActObjectStandardConsequence

Issue · what this lesson is really about

Does the discharge violate statute, contract, public policy, or other legal protection?
這一課問的是:解僱是否違反法律、合約、公共政策、或其他保護?
Trigger words & phrases that should flag this issue:
firedconstructive dischargeretaliationwhistleblowerwrongful

Core Terminology · 7 must-know

Tap a card to flip and reveal the meaning.

wrongful termination
Tap to see meaning
Discharge violating law, contract, or public policy.
不法解僱。
statutory protection
Tap to see meaning
Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, OSHA whistleblower, etc.
法定保護。
breach of employment contract
Tap to see meaning
Express or implied — handbook, oral promise, course of dealing.
違反僱用合約。
public policy exception
Tap to see meaning
Termination violating clearly established public policy.
公共政策例外。
constructive discharge
Tap to see meaning
Conditions so intolerable employee forced to resign.
推定解僱。
damages
Tap to see meaning
Back pay, front pay, emotional distress, attorneys' fees (statutory).
損害。
mitigation
Tap to see meaning
Plaintiff must mitigate by seeking comparable employment.
減損義務。

Rule Sentence · the workhorse

A wrongful termination claim requires that the discharge violate (1) a statute (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, etc.), (2) an express or implied contract limiting termination, or (3) a clearly established public policy reflected in statute or constitution.

Sentence Anatomy · 5 roles, 5 colors

Every rule sentence breaks into five visual roles.

Actor 行為人employer僱主
Act 行為terminating employee解僱員工
Object 對象protected employee受保護員工
Standard 法律標準statutory + contractual + public policy法定 + 合約 + 公共政策
Consequence 後果wrongful termination liability不法解僱責任

Casebook Snapshot · a real American case

Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Supreme Court, 1980 · the public-policy expansion case
Holding. An at-will employee discharged for refusing to participate in an illegal price-fixing scheme states a tort claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, allowing recovery of tort damages including punitive damages.
Why it matters. Tameny established wrongful discharge in violation of public policy as a tort claim, expanding remedies beyond contract.
Tameny:違反公共政策之解僱為侵權訴訟,可獲懲罰性賠償。

Common Mistakes · what trips students

✗ any unfair firing 為 wrongful。
✓ Must violate specific law, contract, or public policy.
須違反具體法、約、政策。

Mini IRAC · build the Application

Issue. May P sue for wrongful termination when P was fired for serving jury duty?
Rule. Wrongful termination claims may arise where discharge violates public policy reflected in statute, including the duty to serve as juror.
Application (model). P was fired for serving jury duty. Because the public-policy exception bars termination for fulfilling civic duties protected by statute, and jury service is universally protected, the fact that P was discharged specifically for performing the statutorily protected jury duty means the public-policy exception applies.
Pick the right element for each blank:
g1.
g2.
Conclusion. Therefore, P has a viable wrongful termination claim.

MBE Check · multiple choice

P's employer creates intolerable working conditions, including harassment, isolation, and demotion. P resigns. Can P claim constructive discharge?

Practice Drill · tap to build the rule

Drop the chips here in correct order:
Tap chips to add → tap chips in the target to remove:

Lesson 09 complete

You can now read, write, and reason this rule in English.

Next lesson →